<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boards Windsurfing &#187; big Windsurfing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boards.mpora.com/tag/big/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boards.mpora.com</link>
	<description>Windsurfing Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Test &#8211; 2012 &#8211; 90 Litre Multi-Fin Waveboards</title>
		<link>http://boards.mpora.com/equipment-tests/tested-equipment/test-2012-90-litre-multifin-waveboards.html</link>
		<comments>http://boards.mpora.com/equipment-tests/tested-equipment/test-2012-90-litre-multifin-waveboards.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tested]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90 litre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quatro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tabou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenerife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waveboards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boards.mpora.com/wordpress/?p=31782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Clone test team grace the shores of Tenerife to test seven wave boards for heavyweight riders, but come away with some surprise conclusions...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="90 Litre Multi-fin test" href="http://www.boardseekermag.com/windsurfing-equipment-tests/2011/90-litre-multi-fin-introduction-2011.html" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-31783" title="90-litre-multi-fins-full" src="http://cdn4.coresites.mpora.com/boards/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/90-litre-multi-fins-full.jpg" alt="" width="588" height="319" /></a></p>
<p>Without a doubt the most important development in the recent history of waveboard design has been the introduction of multi-fins. Whether it be twin, tri, thruster or quad, multi-fin setups have opened many new doors – and as Quatro shaper Keith Teboul rightly states later on in this test, they are definitely here to stay!</p>
<p>Initially, multi-fin waveboards were only to be found gracing the calloused soles of pro-riders – most famously those of Kauli Seadi, who used his multi-fin to crank turns seemingly beyond the laws of physics in Cabo Verde on route to a wave world title. But it wasn’t long before the more mainstream benefits of multi-fin boards became apparent.</p>
<p>First off, it was better waveriding performance in less than ideal conditions. To make the most of small, onshore conditions, a rider needs to hold speed through a tight turn without much help from the wave’s power. Multi-fin boards not only made the bottom turn easier to initiate and potentially tighter, but most importantly they offered a level of control and performance off the top that no singlefin had ever been able to match. Suddenly small mushy waves became a lot of fun! Multi-fin boards allowed more speed to be maintained through the turn and had a fantastic ability to carve or slide through the top turn.</p>
<p>The next big benefit was wind range. Initially multi-fins were knocked for getting planing slower than an equivalent single-fin. But then people realised that, because multi-fins were so much looser than single-fins, you could actually ride a bigger board. Not only that, but at the top end of the wind spectrum, multi-fin boards offered more control. They kept the board manoeuvrable underfoot even when the sail was overpowered, and at the same time, more settled in a straight line with their planted ride. Compensating for slower planing by opting for a bigger board and offering more control at the top end ultimately translated to a waveboard with more wind range – and that’s a very big benefit.</p>
<p>But multi-fins are not just the domain of advanced riders. Now that you’re able to ride a bigger size board that turns more easily and has better wind range, you’re looking at a list of benefits that appeal just as much to the novice wavesailor. It’s no surprise therefore that nearly every waveboard being developed today is a multi-fin.</p>
<p>And that leads me nicely on to size. With people now able to use bigger waveboards, the next – and to an extent still unanswered – question is how big can you actually go?</p>
<p>With almost every brand now producing a dedicated waveboard in the 90-95L size, we asked them if this is really the upper limit or whether we’re likely to see even bigger boards in the future…</p>
<p>Read the full test on our sister site, <a title="90 Litre Multi-fin Test" href="http://www.boardseekermag.com/windsurfing-equipment-tests/2011/90-litre-multi-fin-introduction-2011.html" target="_blank">Boardseeker.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boards.mpora.com/equipment-tests/tested-equipment/test-2012-90-litre-multifin-waveboards.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Page Cache Debug Info
-----------------------
Cache Key: 	boards:page:/tag/big/feed 
Caching Time: 	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:00:52 
-->